Menu
Map
Simple comparison of the historic Christian and LDS views of the canon of Scripture (Bottom-Line Guide to Mormonism, Part 6).
Simple comparison of the historic Christian and LDS views of the text of Scripture (Bottom-Line Guide to Mormonism, Part 7).
This article explains that yes, there are some “lost books” mentioned in the Bible, but no, they were never part of the Bible.
The Bible is ancient; the Book of Mormon is modern (Why Christianity Is True but Mormonism Is Not, Part 2).
The Bible is not missing any books; the Mormon scriptures are (Why Christianity Is True but Mormonism Is Not, Part 5).
The Bible does not have the problems indicating basic lack of authenticity that mark the Book of Mormon and the Book of Abraham.
Academic study by Dr. Ronald V. Huggins on Genesis 1:1 in the Book of Moses, the Book of Abraham, and two of Joseph’s last sermons.
The text of the Bible is reliable; the Joseph Smith Translation is not (Why Christianity Is True but Mormonism Is Not, Part 4).
Is the LDS view that the Bible is corrupted and untrustworthy a fair and accurate assessment? Did Joseph’s changes to the Bible restore parts that were lost from the original manuscripts? This article is part 10A of our series on Gospel Principles and the Bible.
Several changes to the book of Hebrews in Joseph Smith’s “translation” reflect Joseph’s lack of understanding of the Bible.
A reader-friendly version of Joel Groat’s master’s thesis examining the Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible, focusing on the Gospel of John.