Menu
Map
In response to pressure from its own members to address various controversial issues that call its core claims into question, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has published 14 articles on its official website LDS.org since late 2013. Most recently, four new articles about Mormon polygamy by unnamed LDS scholars were posted on the website on October 22, 2014. One of these articles, which discusses Joseph Smith’s polygamy,1 is the focus of this special report.
What Is No Longer in Dispute
The article admits some important facts that have long been known by non-Mormon critics and LDS scholars2 but that until now the LDS Church has tried to keep from rank and file members:
Although the LDS Church admits these facts, several issues are not adequately addressed.
Fanny Alger: Adultery, Not a Plural Wife
The article identifies the first of Joseph’s plural wives (not counting his legal wife Emma) as Fanny Alger, a girl between 16 and 19 years old who lived in his home as a maid (between 1833 and 1836). Some Utah Mormons at the end of the 19th century did speak of Fanny as Joseph’s plural wife. Against these testimonies, which are suspect because of their very late date, the following facts show that Joseph’s relationship with Fanny was almost certainly not a plural marriage but rather simple adultery:
Emma, Oliver, and Martin’s testimonies are far more reliable, since they were all far closer to Joseph in the early 1830s than any of the Mormons who much later claimed it was a plural marriage.3
Joseph’s Teenage Plural Wives
Among Joseph’s plural wives were nine teenagers (not counting Fanny Alger), including two 14-year-olds (Helen Mar Kimball and Nancy Maria Winchester). Although it was legal for girls to marry at 14, it was not normal and would have been criticized in most circumstances, even apart from polygamy.
Evidence is available showing that Joseph, when he was about 37, probably had sexual relations with all or nearly all of the seven plural wives that were 16 to 19 years old.4 The LDS Church, anxious to deny that Joseph had sexual relations with a 14-year-old girl, claims that “Helen Mar Kimball spoke of her sealing to Joseph as being ‘for eternity alone,’ suggesting that the relationship did not involve sexual relations.” However, what Helen said was that she “thought” it would be “for eternity alone”—indicating that after she was sealed to Joseph she found out otherwise.5 It is fairly clear that Joseph regarded all of his teenage plural wives as wives in the full sense, including the right and potential for sexual relationships.6
Taking Other Men’s Wives
The most shocking aspect of Joseph’s polygamy is the fact, admitted in the LDS.org article, that a dozen of his plural wives were legally married to other men (called polyandry). The article offers various justifications for Joseph taking these married women as his wives, giving the impression that no sexual activity was involved. However, the evidence shows that Joseph had sexual relations with several of them7:
Denials of Polygamy
Although the article admits that Joseph Smith tried to keep his plural marriages a secret, it does not acknowledge that LDS scripture rejected polygamy and that Joseph repeatedly denied practicing it:
Joseph’s statement that he could find only one wife might be parsed as a technically accurate, “carefully worded denial” inasmuch as he had only one legal wife. Of course, no one claimed that Joseph had multiple legal wives. For the preceding three years he had taken over thirty plural wives and had engaged in sexual relations with over a dozen of them, including wives of other men, resulting in the births of at least two or three children. Therefore, his statement that he could “only find one” wife was in context a lie. Moreover, his polygamy was in direct violation of what he and the LDS scriptures (most of which he wrote himself) had stated for over a decade was the official teaching of the LDS Church.
Manipulation and Plural Marriage
Mormons who admit that Joseph had plural wives and that he had sexual relations with some of them commonly argue that he did so reluctantly under orders from the Lord. In fact, this rationalization goes back to Joseph himself: as the LDS article notes, Joseph claimed that an angel appeared to him with a sword threatening his destruction if he did not obey the divine mandate. While faithful Mormons may take this story seriously, it is just the sort of manipulative claim that an unscrupulous religious leader might use to coerce young women and their parents into agreeing to secret polygamous unions.
Another manipulative claim that Joseph used to persuade women to become his plural wives—and to persuade their families to go along with it—was that doing so would ensure the exaltation or full salvation of the women and their families. Joseph did not present this idea as his own, but as divine revelation. He did this, for example, in a revelation he issued on July 27, 1842, giving instructions to Newel K. Whitney concerning the ceremony to seal his daughter Sarah Ann to Joseph.13 Similarly, Helen Mar Kimball recalled that Joseph had told her, “If you will take this step, it will ensure your eternal salvation and exaltation and that of your father’s household and all of your kindred.” She then commented, “This promise was so great that I willingly gave myself to purchase so glorious a reward.”14 In effect, Joseph practiced a form of spiritual bribery to coerce this 14-year-old girl into becoming his “wife.”
Joseph’s Polygamy Was Nothing Like Old Testament Polygamy
In defense of the claim that Joseph was commanded to practice plural marriage, the LDS article asserts that “in biblical times, the Lord commanded some of His people to practice plural marriage,” citing Abraham’s union with Hagar as an example. The argument derives from Joseph Smith, who stated in LDS scripture that the Lord commanded Abraham and other Old Testament saints to take plural wives (D&C 132:1, 34-37; see also vv. 49-51, 57, 65). This claim finds absolutely no support from the Bible itself. Rather, God tolerated or at most permitted polygamy. In the case of Abraham, the Bible actually conflicts with Joseph’s interpretation of the matter. According to Genesis, Abraham’s sexual union with Hagar was an idea proposed by his wife Sarah, not something the Lord commanded Abraham to do (Gen. 16:2-5).15
Polygamy is consistently presented throughout the Old Testament in an unflattering way:
The New Testament teaches that God expects followers of Jesus Christ to be either single or monogamous. The apostle Paul includes being “the husband of one wife” on lists of character qualities expected of someone who serves in Christian ministry (1 Timothy 3:2, 12; Titus 1:6). “Marrying” a woman while she was another man’s wife—as Joseph did with at least a dozen women—was nothing less than adultery (Romans 7:2-3). Joseph’s practice of polygamy represents not a “restoration” of a good thing but a reversion or step backward to a bad thing—and a clear violation of New Testament teaching.
Finally, nothing in the polygamy of any figure in the Old Testament in any way justifies or validates Joseph’s specific practice and understanding of plural marriage:
The LDS Church’s commendable admissions regarding Joseph Smith’s polygamy, forced upon it by the wide availability of the facts through the Internet, fall short of genuine transparency on the matter. Joseph’s plural marriages involved sexual relations with married as well as unmarried women, on the basis of false claims of a divine mandate, and included behavior that was both illegal and immoral. As these facts become more widely known, Joseph’s polygamy will trouble more and more thoughtful Mormons.
For in-depth treatment of some of the issues discussed here, see also the following articles:
Joseph Smith’s Teenage Plural Wives
Joseph Smith’s Polyandrous Plural Marriages
Abraham, Hagar, and Joseph Smith’s Polygamy
The Polygamy of David and Solomon
And see further our main page on Polygamy, from which you can find still other articles.
NOTES
1. “Plural Marriage in Kirtland and Nauvoo,” https://www.lds.org/topics/plural-marriage-in-kirtland-and-nauvoo.
2. See especially Todd Compton, In Sacred Loneliness: The Plural Wives of Joseph Smith (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1997); Brian C. Hales, Joseph Smith’s Polygamy, 3 vols. (Salt Lake City: Greg Kofford Books, 2013).
3. See further Robert M. Bowman Jr., “Joseph Smith and Fanny Alger” (Grand Rapids: IRR, 2014).
4. See Hales Joseph Smith’s Polygamy, 1:285-87.
5. Ibid., 2:295.
6. See further Robert M. Bowman Jr., “Joseph Smith’s Teenage Plural Wives” (Grand Rapids: IRR, 2014).
7. For a more detailed analysis, see Robert M. Bowman Jr., “Joseph Smith’s Polyandrous Plural Marriages” (Grand Rapids: IRR, 2014).
8. Quoted in Compton, In Sacred Loneliness, 81; Hales, Joseph Smith’s Polygamy, 1:254 (spelling has been regularized here).
9. Hales, Joseph Smith’s Polygamy, 1:265.
10. Ibid., 1:349-54.
11. Compton, In Sacred Loneliness, 181-85, contra Hales, Joseph Smith’s Polygamy, 1:354-64.
12. Joseph Smith, History of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, ed. B. H. Roberts (Salt Lake City: Deseret News Press, 1902), 6:410-11.
13. H. Michael Marquardt, The Joseph Smith Revelations: Text & Commentary (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1999), 315.
14. Quoted in Compton, In Sacred Loneliness, 499.
15. See further Robert M. Bowman Jr., “Abraham, Hagar, and Joseph Smith’s Polygamy” (Grand Rapids: IRR, 2014).
16. See further Robert M. Bowman Jr., “The Polygamy of David and Solomon” (Grand Rapids: IRR, 2014).